EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Details about Seda Erdem

Homepage:http://www.sedaerdem.com
Workplace:Economics Division, Stirling Management School, University of Stirling, (more information at EDIRC)

Access statistics for papers by Seda Erdem.

Last updated 2024-03-08. Update your information in the RePEc Author Service.

Short-id: per120


Jump to Journal Articles

Working Papers

2016

  1. The effect of front-of-pack nutrition labelling formats on consumers’ food choices and decision-making: merging discrete choice experiment with an eye tracking experiment
    2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Downloads View citations (1)

2014

  1. Addressing elimination and selection by aspects decision rules in discrete choice experiments: does it matter?
    2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Downloads
  2. Position bias in best-worst scaling surveys: a case study on trust in institutions
    2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Downloads View citations (5)
    See also Journal Article Position Bias in Best-worst Scaling Surveys: A Case Study on Trust in Institutions, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association (2015) Downloads View citations (31) (2015)

2011

  1. USING BEST WORST SCALING TO INVESTIGATE PERCEPTIONS OF CONTROL & CONCERN OVER FOOD AND NON-FOOD RISKS
    85th Annual Conference, April 18-20, 2011, Warwick University, Coventry, UK, Agricultural Economics Society Downloads View citations (1)
  2. Using a Discrete Choice Experiment to Elicit Consumers’ WTP for Health Risk Reductions Achieved By Nanotechnology in the UK
    85th Annual Conference, April 18-20, 2011, Warwick University, Coventry, UK, Agricultural Economics Society Downloads

2010

  1. USING BEST WORST SCALING TO INVESTIGATE PERCEPTIONS OF CONTROL AND CONCERN OVER FOOD AND NON-FOOD RISKS
    2010 Annual Meeting, July 25-27, 2010, Denver, Colorado, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Downloads
  2. WHO IS MOST RESPONSIBLE FOR ENSURING THE MEAT WE EAT IS SAFE?
    84th Annual Conference, March 29-31, 2010, Edinburgh, Scotland, Agricultural Economics Society Downloads View citations (2)
    Also in 2010 Annual Meeting, July 25-27, 2010, Denver, Colorado, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association (2010) Downloads View citations (2)

Journal Articles

2023

  1. The Perception of Women in Rural and Remote Scotland About Intrapartum Care: A Qualitative Study
    The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2023, 16, (2), 117-125 Downloads View citations (1)

2022

  1. Can traffic light labelling nudge heuristical decision processes?
    Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, 2022, 6, (1), 37-45 Downloads
  2. Measuring Time Preferences Using Stated Credit Repayment Choices
    Journal of Quantitative Economics, 2022, 20, (1), 43-67 Downloads

2019

  1. Including Opt-Out Options in Discrete Choice Experiments: Issues to Consider
    The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2019, 12, (1), 1-14 Downloads View citations (14)

2018

  1. Who do UK consumers trust for information about nanotechnology?
    Food Policy, 2018, 77, (C), 133-142 Downloads View citations (5)

2017

  1. Preferences for public involvement in health service decisions: a comparison between best-worst scaling and trio-wise stated preference elicitation techniques
    The European Journal of Health Economics, 2017, 18, (9), 1107-1123 Downloads View citations (2)

2015

  1. Accounting for Attribute‐Level Non‐Attendance in a Health Choice Experiment: Does it Matter?
    Health Economics, 2015, 24, (7), 773-789 Downloads View citations (18)
  2. Consumers' Preferences for Nanotechnology in Food Packaging: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2015, 66, (2), 259-279 Downloads View citations (9)
  3. Position Bias in Best-worst Scaling Surveys: A Case Study on Trust in Institutions
    American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2015, 97, (2), 526-545 Downloads View citations (31)
    See also Working Paper Position bias in best-worst scaling surveys: a case study on trust in institutions, 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota (2014) Downloads View citations (5) (2014)

2014

  1. Elimination and selection by aspects in health choice experiments: Prioritising health service innovations
    Journal of Health Economics, 2014, 38, (C), 10-22 Downloads View citations (26)

2013

  1. Investigating Heterogeneity in the Characterization of Risks Using Best Worst Scaling
    Risk Analysis, 2013, 33, (9), 1728-1748 Downloads View citations (8)

2012

  1. Using best–worst scaling to explore perceptions of relative responsibility for ensuring food safety
    Food Policy, 2012, 37, (6), 661-670 Downloads View citations (16)
 
Page updated 2024-11-09