Details about Emily Lancsar

Access statistics for papers by Emily Lancsar.

Last updated 2023-07-09. Update your information in the RePEc Author Service.

Short-id: pla771

Working Papers

2017

1. Intrinsic motivation, health outcomes and the crowding out effect of temporary extrinsic incentives: A lab-in-the-field experiment
   Monash Economics Working Papers, Monash University, Department of Economics

2016

2. From representing views to representativeness of views: Illustrating a new (Q2S) approach in the context of health care priority setting in nine European countries
   Post-Print, HAL View citations (8)

2010

3. Weighting and valuing quality-adjusted life-years using stated preference methods: preliminary results from the Social Value of a QALY Project
   MPRA Paper, University Library of Munich, Germany View citations (15)

2003

4. Diaries or questionnaires for collecting self-reported healthcare utilisation and patient cost data? CHERE Project Report No 20
   Research Reports, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney

2002

5. Deriving welfare measures from stated preference discrete choice modelling experiments, CHERE Discussion Paper No 48
   Discussion Papers, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney View citations (7)
6. New South Wales drug court evaluation: Cost-effectiveness, CHERE Project Report 17a
   Research Reports, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney View citations (5)

Journal Articles

2023

1. Comparison of a full and partial choice set design in a labeled discrete choice experiment
   Health Economics, 2023, 32, (6), 1284-1304 View citations (1)
2. Don’t pay the highly motivated too much
   Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), 2023, 103, (C)
3. Preparing for future pandemics: A multi‐national comparison of health and economic trade‐offs
   Health Economics, 2023, 32, (7), 1434-1452 View citations (1)
4. Progressivity of out-of-pocket costs under Australia's universal health care system: A national linked data study
   Health Policy, 2023, 127, (C), 44-50
5. Systematic Review of the Psychometric Performance of Generic Childhood Multi-attribute Utility Instruments
   Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2023, 21, (4), 559-584 View citations (3)
6. The Use of a Discrete Choice Experiment Including Both Duration and Dead for the Development of an EQ-5D-5L Value Set for Australia
   PharmacoEconomics, 2023, 41, (4), 427-438 View citations (2)

2022

7. Correction to: Systematic Review of Conceptual, Age, Measurement and Valuation Considerations for Generic Multidimensional Childhood Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
   PharmacoEconomics, 2022, 40, (4), 477-478 View citations (4)
8. Modelling online job search and choices of dentists in the Australian job market: Staged sequential DCEs and FIML econometric methods
   Journal of choice modelling, 2022, 44, (C) View citations (1)
9. Preference Elicitation Techniques Used in Valuing Children’s Health-Related Quality-of-Life: A Systematic Review
   PharmacoEconomics, 2022, 40, (7), 663-698 View citations (2)
10. Social acceptability of standard and behavioral economic inspired policies designed to reduce and prevent obesity
    Health Economics, 2022, 31, (1), 197-214 View citations (1)
11. Systematic Review of Conceptual, Age, Measurement and Valuation Considerations for Generic Multidimensional Childhood Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
    PharmacoEconomics, 2022, 40, (4), 379-431 View citations (4)
12. The path towards herd immunity: Predicting COVID-19 vaccination uptake through results from a stated choice study across six continents
    Social Science & Medicine, 2022, 298, (C) View citations (1)
13. Two for the price of one: If moving beyond traditional single‐best discrete choice experiments, should we use best‐worst, best‐best or ranking for preference elicitation?
    Health Economics, 2022, 31, (12), 2630-2647 View citations (2)
14. Valuing the Quality-of-Life Aged Care Consumers (QOL-ACC) Instrument for Quality Assessment and Economic Evaluation
    PharmacoEconomics, 2022, 40, (11), 1069-1079 View citations (1)

2021

15. Estimating decision rule differences between ‘best’ and ‘worst’ choices in a sequential best worst discrete choice experiment
    Journal of choice modelling, 2021, 41, (C)
16. Healthcare Funding Decisions and Real-World Benefits: Reducing Bias by Matching Untreated Patients
    PharmacoEconomics, 2021, 39, (7), 741-756
17. Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part I. Macro-scale analysis of literature and integrative synthesis of empirical evidence from applied economics, experimental psychology and neuroimaging
    Journal of choice modelling, 2021, 41, (C) View citations (10)
18. Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part II. Conceptualisation of external validity, sources and explanations of bias and effectiveness of mitigation methods
    Journal of choice modelling, 2021, 41, (C) View citations (22)

2020

19. 11TH MEETING OF THE INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY OF HEALTH PREFERENCE RESEARCH
    The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2020, 13, (1), 137-143
20. An integrated modelling approach examining the influence of goals, habit and learning on choice using visual attention data
    Journal of Business Research, 2020, 117, (C), 44-57 View citations (2)
21. Empirical Investigation of Ranking vs Best–Worst Scaling Generated Preferences for Attributes of Quality of Life: One and the Same or Differentiable?
    The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2020, 13, (3), 307-315
22. The relative value of different QALY types
    Journal of Health Economics, 2020, 70, (C) View citations (7)

2019

23. Accounts from developers of generic health state utility instruments explain why they produce different QALYs: A qualitative study
    Social Science & Medicine, 2019, 240, (C) View citations (3)
24. Mind the (inter-rater) gap. An investigation of self-reported versus proxy-reported assessments in the derivation of childhood utility values for economic evaluation: A systematic review
    Social Science & Medicine, 2019, 240, (C) View citations (4)
25. Sugar-sweetened beverage price elasticities in a hypothetical convenience store
    Social Science & Medicine, 2019, 225, (C), 98-107 View citations (5)

2018

26. Revealed and Stated Preferences of Decision Makers for Priority Setting in Health Technology Assessment: A Systematic Review
    PharmacoEconomics, 2018, 36, (3), 323-340 View citations (2)

2017

27. Discrete Choice Experiments: A Guide to Model Specification, Estimation and Software
    PharmacoEconomics, 2017, 35, (7), 697-716 View citations (73)
28. Health Preference Research: An Overview
    The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2017, 10, (4), 507-510 View citations (2)
29. Is Dimension Order Important when Valuing Health States Using Discrete Choice Experiments Including Duration?
    PharmacoEconomics, 2017, 35, (4), 439-451 View citations (3)
30. Understanding what matters: An exploratory study to investigate the views of the general public for priority setting criteria in health care
    Health Policy, 2017, 121, (6), 653-662 View citations (5)

2015

31. Attributes and weights in health care priority setting: A systematic review of what counts and to what extent
    Social Science & Medicine, 2015, 146, (C), 41-52 View citations (36)
32. Comparing WTP Values of Different Types of QALY Gain Elicited from the General Public
    Health Economics, 2015, 24, (3), 280-293 View citations (21)
33. Investigating consumers' and informal carers' views and preferences for consumer directed care: A discrete choice experiment
    Social Science & Medicine, 2015, 140, (C), 81-94 View citations (17)

2014

34. A Systematic Review of Stated Preference Studies Reporting Public Preferences for Healthcare Priority Setting
    The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2014, 7, (4), 365-386 View citations (23)
35. How Important Is Health Status in Defining Quality of Life for Older People? An Exploratory Study of the Views of Older South Australians
    Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2014, 12, (1), 73-84 View citations (19)
36. Preferences for Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation: a Best–Best Discrete Choice Experiment
    PharmacoEconomics, 2014, 32, (11), 1115-1127 View citations (17)
37. Reconceptualising the External Validity of Discrete Choice Experiments
    PharmacoEconomics, 2014, 32, (10), 951-965 View citations (30)

2013

38. Best worst discrete choice experiments in health: Methods and an application
    Social Science & Medicine, 2013, 76, (C), 74-82 View citations (41)

2011

39. Deriving distributional weights for QALYs through discrete choice experiments
    Journal of Health Economics, 2011, 30, (2), 466-478 View citations (44)
40. Searchers vs surveyors in estimating the monetary value of a QALY: resolving a nasty dilemma for NICE
    Health Economics, Policy and Law, 2011, 6, (4), 435-447 View citations (17)

2009

41. Choice experiments in health: the good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future
    Health Economics, Policy and Law, 2009, 4, (4), 527-546 View citations (57)

2008

42. Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making
    PharmacoEconomics, 2008, 26, (8), 661-677 View citations (211)

2007

43. Patient preferences for managing asthma: results from a discrete choice experiment
    Health Economics, 2007, 16, (7), 703-717 View citations (29)
44. Several methods to investigate relative attribute impact in stated preference experiments
    Social Science & Medicine, 2007, 64, (8), 1738-1753 View citations (62)

2006

45. Deleting ‘irrational’ responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences?
    Health Economics, 2006, 15, (8), 797-811 View citations (116)

2005

46. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: Distinguishing between the method and its application
    The European Journal of Health Economics, 2005, 6, (4), 314-316 View citations (10)

2004

47. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the New South Wales Adult Drug Court Program
    Evaluation Review, 2004, 28, (1), 3-27 View citations (2)
48. Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: a response to Ryan and Santos Silva
    Health Economics, 2004, 13, (9), 919-924 View citations (5)
49. Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: inconsistency between current methods and random utility and welfare theory
    Health Economics, 2004, 13, (9), 901-907 View citations (57)

Chapters

2014

1. Choice modelling research in health economics
   Chapter 28 in Handbook of Choice Modelling, 2014, pp 675-687 View citations (2)