Details about Stale Navrud

Access statistics for papers by Stale Navrud.

Last updated 2022-04-13. Update your information in the RePEc Author Service.

Short-id: pna692

Working Papers

2020

1. Acceptance of national wind power development and exposure. A case-control choice experiment approach
   Discussion Papers, Statistics Norway, Research Department View citations (1)
2. Scope elasticity and economic significance in discrete choice experiments
   Discussion Papers, Statistics Norway, Research Department

2018

3. Assessing the economic valuation of the benefits of regulating chemicals: Lessons learned from five case studies
   OECD Environment Working Papers, OECD Publishing
4. Global Biodiversity Costs of Climate Change. Improving the damage assessment of species loss in Integrated Assessment Models
   Working Paper Series, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, School of Economics and Business View citations (1)

2017

5. Possibilities and challenges in transfer and generalisation of monetary estimates for environmental and health benefits of regulating chemicals
   OECD Environment Working Papers, OECD Publishing View citations (1)

2014

6. A"Delphi exercise"as a tool in Amazon rainforest valuation
   Policy Research Working Paper Series, The World Bank View citations (2)

2013

7. Providing Preference-Based Support for Forest Ecosystem Service Management in Poland
   Working Papers, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw
8. Valuing global public goods: a European Delphi stated preference survey of population willingness to pay for Amazon rainforest preservation
   Policy Research Working Paper Series, The World Bank View citations (3)

2012

9. Capturing the Benefits of Preserving World Heritage Cultural Heritage Sites
   EBLA Working Papers, University of Turin

2011

10. Using Internet in Stated Preference Surveys: A Review and Comparison of Survey Modes
    MPRA Paper, University Library of Munich, Germany View citations (46)
    See also Journal Article in International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics (2011)
11. What Do Respondents Bring to Contingent Valuation? A Comparison of Monetary and Labor Payment Vehicles
    Discussion Papers, Resources For the Future View citations (8)
    See also Journal Article in Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy (2014)

2010

12. Can cheap panel-based internet surveys substitute costly in-person interviews in CV surveys?
    MPRA Paper, University Library of Munich, Germany View citations (1)

2009

13. The External Cost of European Crude Oil Imports
    Sustainable Development Papers, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) View citations (1)
    Also in Working Papers, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (2009) View citations (1)

2008

14. Asking for Individual or Household Willingness to Pay for Environmental Goods? Implication for aggregate welfare measures
    MPRA Paper, University Library of Munich, Germany View citations (5)
15. Internet CV surveys – a cheap, fast way to get large samples of biased values?
    MPRA Paper, University Library of Munich, Germany View citations (9)
16. Valuing forest recreation on the national level in a transition economy: The case of Poland
    MPRA Paper, University Library of Munich, Germany View citations (21)
    See also Journal Article in Forest Policy and Economics (2008)

2007

17. How Reliable are Meta-Analyses for International Benefit Transfers?
    MPRA Paper, University Library of Munich, Germany View citations (5)
    See also Journal Article in Ecological Economics (2008)

1993

18. Valuing Biodiversity in Norwegian Forests: A Contingent Valuation Study with Multiple Bias Testing
    Memorandum, Oslo University, Department of Economics View citations (6)

Journal Articles

2022

1. Valuing Intangible Cultural Heritage in Developing Countries
   Sustainability, 2022, 14, (8), 1-20

2021

2. Guidance to Enhance the Validity and Credibility of Environmental Benefit Transfers
   Environmental & Resource Economics, 2021, 79, (3), 575-624 View citations (5)
3. Scope Elasticity of Willingness to pay in Discrete Choice Experiments
   Environmental & Resource Economics, 2021, 80, (1), 21-57 View citations (1)

2020

4. Acceptance of wind power development and exposure – Not-in-anybody's-backyard
   Energy Policy, 2020, 147, (C) View citations (6)
5. Not my cup of coffee: Farmers’ preferences for coffee variety traits – Lessons for crop breeding in the age of climate change
   Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, 2020, 09, (3) View citations (1)

2019

6. Are non-monetary payment modes more uncertain for stated preference elicitation in developing countries?
   Journal of choice modelling, 2019, 30, (C), 73-87 View citations (5)
7. Smartphone and tablet effects in contingent valuation web surveys – No reason to worry?
   Ecological Economics, 2019, 165, (C), - View citations (5)
8. The power of collaborative deliberation in stakeholder dialogue seminars
   Journal of Risk Research, 2019, 22, (2), 243-267

2018

9. Valuing Global Ecosystem Services: What Do European Experts Say? Applying the Delphi Method to Contingent Valuation of the Amazon Rainforest
   Environmental & Resource Economics, 2018, 70, (1), 249-269 View citations (3)

2017

10. Using the Delphi method to value protection of the Amazon rainforest
    Ecological Economics, 2017, 131, (C), 475-484 View citations (13)

2016

11. Valuing unfamiliar and complex environmental goods: A comparison of valuation workshops and internet panel surveys with videos
    Ecological Economics, 2016, 129, (C), 50-61 View citations (19)

2015

12. The social benefits and costs of preserving forest biodiversity and ecosystem services
    Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2015, 4, (2), 202-222 View citations (8)
13. Willingness to pay for unfamiliar public goods: Preserving cold-water coral in Norway
    Ecological Economics, 2015, 112, (C), 53-67 View citations (29)

2014

14. Modeling demand for catastrophic flood risk insurance in coastal zones in Vietnam using choice experiments
    Environment and Development Economics, 2014, 19, (2), 228-249 View citations (9)
15. Providing preference-based support for forest ecosystem service management
    Forest Policy and Economics, 2014, 39, (C), 1-12 View citations (20)
16. What do respondents bring to contingent valuation? A comparison of monetary and labour payment vehicles
    Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2014, 3, (3), 253-267 View citations (12)
    See also Working Paper (2011)

2012

17. Non-market valuation of forest goods and services: Good practice guidelines
    Journal of Forest Economics, 2012, 18, (4), 259-270 View citations (22)
18. Using Meta-Analysis and GIS for Value Transfer and Scaling Up: Valuing Climate Change Induced Losses of European Wetlands
    Environmental & Resource Economics, 2012, 52, (3), 395-413 View citations (35)

2011

19. Are Internet surveys an alternative to face-to-face interviews in contingent valuation?
    Ecological Economics, 2011, 70, (9), 1628-1637 View citations (79)
20. Making Benefit Transfers Work: Deriving and Testing Principles for Value Transfers for Similar and Dissimilar Sites Using a Case Study of the Non-Market Benefits of Water Quality Improvements Across Europe
    Environmental & Resource Economics, 2011, 50, (3), 365-387 View citations (67)
21. Using Internet in Stated Preference Surveys: A Review and Comparison of Survey Modes
    International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 2011, 5, (4), 309-351 View citations (45)
    See also Working Paper (2011)
22. Valuing Mortality Risk Reductions from Environmental, Transport, and Health Policies: A Global Meta‐Analysis of Stated Preference Studies
    Risk Analysis, 2011, 31, (9), 1381-1407 View citations (31)

2009

23. Applying the dissonance-minimising format to value cultural heritage in developing countries
    Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2009, 53, (3), 17 View citations (2)
    Also in Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2009, 53, (3), 327-343 (2009) View citations (2)
24. Asking for Individual or Household Willingness to Pay for Environmental Goods?
    Environmental & Resource Economics, 2009, 43, (1), 11-29 View citations (28)
25. Valuing environmental goods and services derived from the forests
    Journal of Forest Economics, 2009, 15, (1-2), 1-14 View citations (12)

2008

26. How reliable are meta-analyses for international benefit transfers?
    Ecological Economics, 2008, 66, (2-3), 425-435 View citations (46)
    See also Working Paper (2007)
27. Valuing forest recreation on the national level in a transition economy: The case of Poland
    Forest Policy and Economics, 2008, 10, (7-8), 467-472 View citations (22)
    See also Working Paper (2008)

2007

28. Consumers' Preferences for Green and Brown Electricity: a Choice Modelling Approach
    Revue d'économie politique, 2007, 117, (5), 795-811 View citations (37)
29. Valuing cultural heritage in developing countries: comparing and pooling contingent valuation and choice modelling estimates
    Environmental & Resource Economics, 2007, 38, (1), 51-69 View citations (37)

2006

30. Contingent valuation and actual payment for voluntarily provided passive-use values: Assessing the effect of an induced truth-telling mechanism and elicitation formats
    Applied Economics, 2006, 38, (7), 735-756 View citations (17)
31. International benefit transfer: Methods and validity tests
    Ecological Economics, 2006, 60, (2), 429-434 View citations (48)
32. Lexicographic preference in biodiversity valuation: Tests of inconsistencies and willingness to pay
    Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2006, 49, (2), 167-180 View citations (5)

2005

33. Benefit Transfer – The Quick, the Dirty, and the Ugly?
    Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, 2005, 20, (3), 5 View citations (4)
34. Validity Tests of Benefit Transfer – Are We Performing the Wrong Tests?
    Environmental & Resource Economics, 2005, 30, (3), 279-286 View citations (37)

2004

35. Benefit Transfer in Europe: How Reliable Are Transfers between Countries?
    Environmental & Resource Economics, 2004, 29, (1), 67-82 View citations (60)
36. Contingent valuation of ill health caused by pollution: testing for context and ordering effects
    Portuguese Economic Journal, 2004, 3, (2), 145-156

2001

37. How Do Respondents with Uncertain Willingness to Pay Answer Contingent Valuation Questions?
    Land Economics, 2001, 77, (3), 315-326 View citations (80)
38. Valuing Health Impacts from Air Pollution in Europe
    Environmental & Resource Economics, 2001, 20, (4), 305-329 View citations (29)

1997

39. Environmental Valuation – To Use or Not to Use? A Comparative Study of the United States and Europe
    Environmental & Resource Economics, 1997, 10, (1), 1-26 View citations (22)

1994

40. Environmental valuation in developing countries: The recreational value of wildlife viewing
    Ecological Economics, 1994, 11, (2), 135-151 View citations (50)

Edited books

2002

1. Valuing Cultural Heritage
   Books, Edward Elgar Publishing View citations (133)

Chapters

2017

1. Valuing marine ecosystem services loss from oil spills for use in cost–benefit analysis of preventive measures
   Chapter 5 in Handbook on the Economics and Management of Sustainable Oceans, 2017, pp 124-137 View citations (1)

2013

2. Preliminary valuation of a cultural heritage site of global significance: a Delphi contingent valuation study
   Chapter 31 in Handbook on the Economics of Cultural Heritage, 2013, pp i-i View citations (1)

2002

3. Methods for Valuing Cultural Heritage
   Chapter 2 in Valuing Cultural Heritage, 2002 View citations (8)
4. Review of Existing Studies, Their Policy Use and Future Research Needs
   Chapter 15 in Valuing Cultural Heritage, 2002 View citations (3)
5. Social Costs and Benefits of Preserving and Restoring the Nidaros Cathedral
   Chapter 3 in Valuing Cultural Heritage, 2002 View citations (4)
6. Why Value Cultural Heritage?
   Chapter 1 in Valuing Cultural Heritage, 2002 View citations (2)