Details about Ulf Sandström

Access statistics for papers by Ulf Sandström.

Last updated 2026-01-14. Update your information in the RePEc Author Service.

Short-id: psa1213

Working Papers

2024

1. The Costs of Competition in Distributing Scarce Research Funds
   Papers, arXiv.org View citations (1)
   See also Journal Article The costs of competition in distributing scarce research funds, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2024) View citations (1) (2024)

2014

2. Defining the Role of Cognitive Distance in the Peer Review Process: Explorative Study of a Grant Scheme in Infection Biology
   INDEK Working Paper Series, Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Industrial Economics and Management

2013

3. Review of Diffusion Research
   INDEK Working Paper Series, Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Industrial Economics and Management View citations (1)

Journal Articles

2024

1. The costs of competition in distributing scarce research funds
   Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2024, 121, (50), e2407644121 View citations (1)
   See also Working Paper The Costs of Competition in Distributing Scarce Research Funds, Papers (2024) View citations (1) (2024)

2019

2. Measuring researcher independence using bibliometric data: A proposal for a new performance indicator
   PLOS ONE, 2019, 14, (3), 1-20 View citations (9)

2018

3. Funding, evaluation, and the performance of national research systems
   Journal of Informetrics, 2018, 12, (1), 365-384 View citations (27)
   Also in Journal of Informetrics, 2024, 18, (3) (2024)
4. Studying grant decision-making: a linguistic analysis of review reports
   Scientometrics, 2018, 117, (1), 313-329 View citations (14)

2017

5. Vicious circles of gender bias, lower positions, and lower performance: Gender differences in scholarly productivity and impact
   PLOS ONE, 2017, 12, (8), 1-16 View citations (29)

2016

6. Gender differences in research performance and its impact on careers: a longitudinal case study
   Scientometrics, 2016, 106, (1), 143-162 View citations (47)
7. Towards field-adjusted production: Estimating research productivity from a zero-truncated distribution
   Journal of Informetrics, 2016, 10, (4), 1143-1152 View citations (6)

2015

8. Defining the role of cognitive distance in the peer review process with an explorative study of a grant scheme in infection biology
   Research Evaluation, 2015, 24, (3), 271-281 View citations (8)
9. Early career grants, performance, and careers: A study on predictive validity of grant decisions
   Journal of Informetrics, 2015, 9, (4), 826-838 View citations (24)
10. Large-scale bibliometric review of diffusion research
    Scientometrics, 2015, 102, (2), 1615-1645 View citations (4)

2009

11. Combining curriculum vitae and bibliometric analysis: mobility, gender and research performance
    Research Evaluation, 2009, 18, (2), 135-142 View citations (11)
12. Research quality and diversity of funding: A model for relating research money to output of research
    Scientometrics, 2009, 79, (2), 341-349 View citations (12)
13. The field factor: towards a metric for academic institutions
    Research Evaluation, 2009, 18, (3), 243-250 View citations (6)

2008

14. Persistent nepotism in peer-review
    Scientometrics, 2008, 74, (2), 175-189 View citations (18)
    Also in Scientometrics, 2021, 126, (2), 1863-1865 (2021)

2000

15. Inertia and change in Scandinavian public-sector research systems: the case of biotechnology
    Science and Public Policy, 2000, 27, (6), 443-454 View citations (3)
16. Institutionalizing the triple helix: research funding and norms in the academic system
    Research Policy, 2000, 29, (2), 291-301 View citations (63)