Purchasing Power Parity Between China and Selected BRI Countries in Asia

Shu-kam Lee, Paul Kwok-ching Shum, Hugo Hin-to Lee and Kai-yin Woo
Additional contact information
Shu-kam Lee: Department of Economics and Finance Business, Economic and Public Policy Research Centre Hong Kong Shue Yan University, Hong Kong
Paul Kwok-ching Shum: Rita Tong Liu School of Business and Hospitality Management Saint Francis University, Hong Kong
Hugo Hin-to Lee: Sciences Po, France
Kai-yin Woo: Department of Economics and Finance Hong Kong Shue Yan University, Hong Kong

Advances in Decision Sciences, 2023, vol. 27, issue 3, 86-108

Abstract: [Purpose] This study tests the validity of purchasing power parity (PPP) between China and the 18 other Asian countries that have joined the ‘Belt and Road Initiative’ (BRI). The Chinese Government launched the BRI plan to enhance trade and promote market integration among the participating countries. The validity of PPP reflects the degree of market integration and serves as a prerequisite for future economic integration. [Methodology] Nonparametric nonlinear rank tests are used to examine whether this is any cointegration in the PPP models. This testing approach is valid even if the functional form of PPP is unknown or nonlinear. Additionally, we address the rank problem in the multivariate PPP models. [Findings] Our empirical results reveal strong evidence of the PPP relationship and reasonably strong evidence of nonlinearity in the data. Our findings show that some Asian BRI countries have experienced integration of their markets with that of China during the recent decade but not over the entire sample period. This implies that China’s economic power has been rising with larger trade volumes with Asian trading partners, especially during the most recent decade, which, in turn, infers that the integration of markets through BRI projects has been enhanced. However, hidden transaction costs due to geopolitical risks may have resulted in the failure of the PPP relationship between China and some Asian countries during the past decade. The findings of PPP in our paper are useful for academics, practitioners, and policymakers in making better decisions for trading between China and the Asian BRI countries. [Practical Implications] The findings imply that China should get better economic cooperation and greater economic integration with all the Asian BRI members. However, the fear of geopolitical risks and military conflicts in Asia could lead to an increase in transaction costs, resulting in drawbacks from the PPP relationship between China and the Asian countries, especially after the Russia-Ukraine war.

Keywords: Belt and Road; nonparametric nonlinear cointegration; transaction costs; China; Goods market integration (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C10 F41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://iads.site/purchasing-power-parity-between- ... i-countries-in-asia/
https://iads.site/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Purch ... ountries-in-Asia.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aag:wpaper:v:27:y:2023:i:3:p:86-108

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Advances in Decision Sciences from Asia University, Taiwan Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Vincent Pan ().