The adverse effects of incentives regulation in health care: a comparative analysis with the U.S. and Japanese hospital data

Galina Besstremyannaya

No w0218, Working Papers from New Economic School (NES)

Abstract: The paper analyzes the effect of incentives regulation, when the yardstick competition approach is supplemented with a performance tax on providers. In an application to prospective payments in health care in the U.S. and Japan, we show differential effects of value-based purchasing, when price-setting is related to benchmark values of quality measures or length-of-stay. The predictions of our theoretical model, as well as empirical results offer persuasive evidence that unintended effects appear for best-performing hospitals. Patient experience/clinical-process-of-care measures significantly decrease in the top percentiles of the U.S. hospitals owing to the reform. Similarly, length of stay significantly increases for most diagnosis-related groups at Japanese hospitals in percentiles with the lowest length of stay. A natural experiment aimed at best-practice rate-setting diminishes the undesired effects of the reform.

Keywords: quantile regressions; prospective payment; hospital financing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C22 C23 D21 D22 I18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 55 pages
Date: 2015-10
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nes.ru/files/Preprints-resh/WP218.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:abo:neswpt:w0218

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from New Economic School (NES) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Vladimir Ivanyukhin ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).