 That is why Mark Harrison is “right and wrongâ€. To the question about comparing mobilizations of economies during the First and Second World warsO. Yu. Kаzenkov (), G. G. Popov () and D. N. Ermakov () RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Economics. Management. Law, 2019, issue 2 Abstract: The article analyses Mark Harrison scientific approaches to the estimation of military and economic potentials of the states which participated in the World wars. Accordingly, the authors apply a historical and economic analysis basing on the comparison of macroeconomic indicators, as in the works of M. Harrison. The aim of this paper is to reveal the relationship between the nature of the political system and a scale of the economy mobilization in conditions of World wars. The main point of the analysis is the question of the nature of the political system influence on the economy mobilization. The authors have come up with opinion that the political system affected the economy mobilization scale less than the economic circumstances. Often a central factor in increasing military production, as the author believes, was the loss of GDP incurred by a war. This article For the first time in historiography this article contains a critical approach to research results of M. Harrison. Scientists engaged in the economic history of the twentieth century and anyone interested in history may find this paper interesting. Date: 2019 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aca:journl:y:2019:id:159 DOI: 10.28995/2073-6304-2018-2-123-141 Access Statistics for this article More articles in RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Economics. Management. Law from Russian State University for the Humanities (RSUH) |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.