Grattan Institute's Case for Sugar Tax is Not Proven

Jonathan Pincus

No 2017-04, Adelaide Economics Working Papers from Adelaide University, School of Economics

Abstract: Duckett and Swerissen (2016) advocated a 40-cent tax per 100g of sugar in sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB), because the tax would reduce the cost burden on the non-obese. Duckett and Swerissen took these third party costs as indices of market failure. However, their distributional analysis is not an appropriate framework for the assessment of economic efficiency. Moreover, they did not quantify the casual mechanisms through which a small weight loss would appreciably lower the health costs and increase the employment of the obese. There may be an economic case for such a tax, but Duckett and Swerissen have not made it.

Date: 2017-04
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://media.adelaide.edu.au/economics/papers/doc/wp2017-04.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Grattan Institute's Case for Sugar Tax Is Not Proven (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:adl:wpaper:2017-04

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Adelaide Economics Working Papers from Adelaide University, School of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chansik Yoon () and Ruby Nguyen ().