Adverse Outcomes of Pregnancy in South African Women

Zeleke Worku
Additional contact information
Zeleke Worku: Tshwane University of Technology (TUT) Business School, South Africa

Global Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 2017, vol. 1, issue 3, 39-51

Abstract: This paper is a result of a 6-year long follow-up study that was conducted in the City of Tshwane, South Africa in order to assess the impact of underutilization of modern family planning methods on adverse outcomes of pregnancy in women of the childbearing age of 15 to 49 years. The Cox Proportional Hazards Model was used for estimating hazard ratios. Multilevel analysis was used for estimating variability in the utilization of modern family planning methods at service delivery wards and health service facilities. The study showed that women who experienced adverse outcomes of pregnancy were characterized by poor utilization of reproductive health and modern family planning services. The percentage of women who regularly used modern family planning methods such as condoms, pills, injections, intra-uterine devices and sterilization was 41.74%. The average ages of women at first sex and pregnancy were 18.72 and 19.36 years respectively. Adverse outcomes of pregnancy occurred in 12.19% of women. Based on Odds Ratios (OR) estimated from binary logistic regression analysis, utilization of contraceptives was significantly influenced by the degree of access to family planning services, level of support from sexual partner, and young age at first pregnancy. The occurrence of adverse outcomes of pregnancy was significantly influenced by easy access to family planning services, unwanted pregnancy, and young age at first pregnancy. There was a significant difference among the 20 health service delivery wards and 11 health service facilities in which reproductive health services were delivered to women with regards to the quality of service delivery.

Keywords: Journal of Reproductive Medicine; Reproductive Medicine; journal of reproductive medicine; reproductive medicine articles; reproductive medicine articles impact factor; reproductive medicine research journals; reproductive journals list; open access; juniper publishers journals; juniper publishers reivew (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://juniperpublishers.com/gjorm/pdf/GJORM.MS.ID.555561.pdf (application/pdf)
https://juniperpublishers.com/gjorm/GJORM.MS.ID.555561.php (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:adp:jgjorm:v:1:y:2017:i:3:p:39-51

DOI: 10.19080/GJORM.2017.01.555561

Access Statistics for this article

Global Journal of Reproductive Medicine is currently edited by Sophia Mathis

More articles in Global Journal of Reproductive Medicine from Juniper Publishers Inc.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Robert Thomas ().