Ricardo's Theory of Comparative Advantage: Old Idea, New Evidence

Arnaud Costinot and Dave Donaldson

American Economic Review, 2012, vol. 102, issue 3, 453-58

Abstract: When asked to name one proposition in the social sciences that is both true and non-trivial, Paul Samuelson famously replied: 'Ricardo's theory of comparative advantage'. Truth, however, in Samuelson's reply refers to the fact that Ricardo's theory of comparative advantage is mathematically correct, not that it is empirically valid. In this paper we develop and implement an empirical test of Ricardo's ideas. We use novel agricultural data that describe the productivity in 17 crops of 1.6 million parcels of land in 55 countries around the world. We find that a regression of log observed output on log predicted output has a (precisely estimated) slope of 0.84 and an R-squared of 0.93. In our view, these findings offer considerable support for Ricardo's ideas.

Date: 2012
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (58)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/aer.102.3.453 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Ricardo's Theory of Comparative Advantage: Old Idea, New Evidence (2012)
Working Paper: Ricardo's Theory of Comparative Advantage: Old Idea, New Evidence (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:102:y:2012:i:3:p:453-58

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/subscriptions

Access Statistics for this article

American Economic Review is currently edited by Esther Duflo

More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().