The Trouble with Stock Options

Brian J. Hall and Kevin J. Murphy

Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2003, vol. 17, issue 3, 49-70

Abstract: The benefits of stock options are often not large enough to offset the inefficiency implied by the large divergence between the cost of options to companies and the value of options to risk-averse, undiversified executives and employees. Moreover, the benefits of options can often be achieved more effectively and economically through other means. Why are options so prevalent? Several explanations include changes in corporate governance, reporting requirements, taxes, the bull market and managerial rent-seeking. We offer an alternative hypothesis: boards and managers incorrectly perceive stock options to be inexpensive because options create no accounting charge and require no cash outlay.

Date: 2003
Note: DOI: 10.1257/089533003769204353
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (234)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/089533003769204353 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:jecper:v:17:y:2003:i:3:p:49-70

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/subscriptions

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Perspectives is currently edited by Enrico Moretti

More articles in Journal of Economic Perspectives from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().