EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Protester or non-protester: a binary state? on the use (and non-use) of latent class models to analyse protesting in economic valuation

Jürgen Meyerhoff, Anna Bartczak and Ulf Liebe

Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2012, vol. 56, issue 3, 17

Abstract: In the analysis of stated preferences studies, it is often assumed that protesting is a discretely measured item only occurring among those who are not willing to pay. However, various studies have recently shown that protest beliefs are as well held by respondents who state a positive willingness to pay (WTP). Using latent class (LC) models, we investigate the extent of heterogeneity with respect to protest beliefs among all respondents of two contingent valuation studies. The advantage of LC models is that classes of individuals are endogenously identified and no selection bias is introduced by ad hoc definitions of protesters. Further we investigate whether it is possible to identify a class of non-protesters. Finding a group of pure non-protesters could indicate how strongly stated WTP in the whole sample is affected by protest beliefs. For both samples, we find a class with strong protest beliefs but no pure non-protest class. Overall, our results suggest that LC models might not be the first choice to determine unbiased WTP measures, but they provide valuable insights into the degree of protesting expressed by different groups and corresponding determinants of group membership.

Keywords: Environmental; Economics; and; Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/211675/files/j.1467-8489.2012.00582.x.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Protester or non-protester: a binary state? On the use (and non-use) of latent class models to analyse protesting in economic valuation (2012) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:aareaj:211675

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.211675

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics from Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-07
Handle: RePEc:ags:aareaj:211675