A COMPARISON OF CERTAIN DECISION-MAKING TECHNIQUES UNDER RISK - AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF MAIZE CULTIVAR SELECTION
J. van Zyl and
J. A. Groenewald
Agrekon, 1986, vol. 25, issue 01
Abstract:
Results obtained with stochastic dominance, linear risk-programming (MOTAD), regression line evaluation and expected value calculations on maize-cultivar selection under varying circumstances were compared. Maize cultivar trial results of four localities over 14 years were used. Two levels of management were included. Cultivar selections obtained by the different methods show a remarkable similarity. This is probably the result of the relative normal distribution in cultivar gross margins. The largest single disadvantage of cultivar selection by adaptation regressions and expected value calculations is that it considers only the value of the gross margin and largely ignores the variance. This can lead to selection of ill-adapted cultivars. Stochastic dominance and MOTAD take both the expected value and variance into consideration. MOTAD is particularly useful as it invariably selects cultivar combinations.
Keywords: Agricultural and Food Policy; Crop Production/Industries; Risk and Uncertainty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1986
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/267087/files/agrekon-25-01-002.pdf (application/pdf)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/267087/files/a ... 2.pdf?subformat=pdfa (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:agreko:267087
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.267087
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Agrekon from Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().