Initiatives For Rural Development Through Collective Action: The Case of Household Participation in Group Activities in the Highlands of Central Kenya

Gatarwa Kariuki and Frank Place

No 42487, CAPRi Working Papers from CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)

Abstract: Dimensions of the nature, scope, and complexity of collective action in Kenya have evolved over many years. In studying collective action, the aim is to understand why and how people participate in networks of trust. The purpose of this study was to investigate the different objectives that farmers pursue through collective action with the aim of understanding the patterns of people’s participation in collective action, identify factors that influence people to join groups, and identify the costs and benefits of participating in activities of groups. The study was carried out in four sites spread across the highlands of central Kenya. Data was collected from a total of 442 households, focusing on whether members of those households belonged to groups and if so, what type of groups these were and their activities. In addition we looked at how these groups functioned and identified some of the contributions members make to these groups and the benefits from the same. The analysis shows that collective action is used to accomplish a range of activities for different socioeconomic categories and that the majority of households in central Kenya engage in some form of group activity. There are numerous active groups in central Kenya, most starting on their own initiative. They are very dynamic and take on many new activities often involving income generation. Gender has an influence on the nature of collective action. Findings suggest that men and women are engaged in similar group activities but the motivation for joining groups and extent of participation may be different. Men and women have different priorities which influence their decision to join groups. Access to markets and social insurance coping mechanisms are the main reason why men join groups while for women, social insurance and building household assets are the primary reasons why they join groups. Women are likely to engage significantly in subsistence agriculture while men are traditionally inclined towards the production of commercial enterprises through which they obtain their major source of income. Men will therefore be more interested in joining groups that have an element of commercialization and marketing. The study suggests that where institutions and policies that promote individual or private sector growth are weak, collective action can help to overcome these weaknesses and connect individuals in these institutions and policies.

Keywords: Community/Rural/Urban; Development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 54
Date: 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/42487/files/capriwp43.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:capriw:42487

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.42487

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CAPRi Working Papers from CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().