Interpreting “Necessary”: Balancing Trade Liberalization and Regulatory Autonomy

Rohan Pillai

Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, 2023, vol. 24, issue 01

Abstract: The GATT, GATS, SPS, and TBT Agreements use the term “necessary” to demarcate the limits of permissible treaty inconsistent Member State measures, in the form of positive or negative obligations. A balance is struck between the pursuit of trade liberalization and the maintenance of regulatory autonomy in the treaty text itself. Judicial interpretation by the Dispute Settlement Body of these provisions appears to have evolved and struck a different balance than that which was originally envisaged. This paper attempts to verify if the evolution of the interpretation of “necessary” maintains the balance between trade liberalization and regulatory autonomy originally envisioned in the WTO Agreements. First, through determination by examination of the supposed original balance in the treaty text itself, and thereafter by examination of the evolution of the interpretation of provisions which have received judicial attention of the DSB panel and Appellate Body.

Keywords: International; Relations/Trade (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/337400/files/Pillai24-1lay.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:ecjilt:337400

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.337400

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy from Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().