Vulgarisation et développement, réexamen de la problématique

Michel Petit

Économie rurale, 1984, vol. 159

Abstract: Introductory paper to the session. Rather than arguing on definitions, it is essential to note that extension work is a part of agricultural policy and depends on the global situation of agriculture. Since the latter has changed, reappraisal of extension is needed. A rather critical evaluation is presented : inadequate coordination, complex financing channels, poor links with teaching activities. Farmers' needs, their decision making processes, dynamics of local groups must be better taken into account for a new start.

Keywords: Teaching/Communication/Extension/Profession (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1984
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/350080/files/e ... 4_num_159_1_3017.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:ersfer:350080

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.350080

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Économie rurale from French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().