Être et avoir. Patrimoine versus capital: le cas de l'agriculture

Denis Barthélemy

Économie rurale, 2000, vol. 260

Abstract: The legal organization of the farm may be viewed as the relative movement of two institutions: the firm (ensuring the growth of a capital) and the family (presiding over a patrimony designed to secure its long-term survival). An analysis of the farm lease legal regulations, of the policy with regard to farm structure and farm entry, and of the operating principles of the CAP, reveals the emergence of a capital rationality in contrast to the per-existing patrimonial logic, accompanied by the submission of the firm to a patrimonial finality. This research brings out the lack of consistency characterizing the concept of patrimony in economic analysis, echoing its individualizing reduction at the level of legal concept.

Date: 2000
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/355023/files/e ... 0_num_260_1_1108.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:ersfer:355023

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.355023

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Économie rurale from French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().