ARE THE WELFARE LOSSES FROM IMPERFECT TARGETING IMPORTANT?

Emmanuel Skoufias and David P. Coady

No 16448, FCND Discussion Papers from CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)

Abstract: We evaluate the size of the welfare losses from using alternative “imperfect” welfare indicators as substitutes for the conventionally preferred consumption indicator. We find that whereas the undercoverage and leakage welfare indices always suggest substantial losses, and the poverty indices suggest substantial losses for the worst performing indices, our preferred welfare index based on standard welfare theory suggests much smaller welfare losses. We also find that we cannot reject the hypothesis that the welfare losses associated with using the better performing alternative indicators are zero. In the case of our preferred welfare index, this reflects the fact that most of the targeting errors, i.e., exclusion and inclusion errors, are highly concentrated around the poverty line so that the differences in welfare weights between those receiving and not receiving the transfers are insufficient to make a difference to the overall welfare impact. Our results appear to be robust to the aversion to inequality assumed, as well as across the various welfare indices.

Keywords: Food; Security; and; Poverty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 44
Date: 2002
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/16448/files/fc020125.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:fcnddp:16448

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.16448

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in FCND Discussion Papers from CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().