EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Are veterinary drug maximum residue limits protectionist? International evidence

Akinbode Okunola, Elliott Dennis and John Beghin ()

No 342915, Staff Papers from University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Agricultural Economics

Abstract: We analyze the distribution of maximum residue limits (MRLs) on veterinary drugs used in animal production and aquaculture in a global context of food consumption and trade. We compare MRLs by drug–commodity pairs for a large set of countries, commodities, and drugs. We find that international standards by Codex Alimentarius only cover a small fraction of the drug-commodity pairs. We compare countries’ MRLs to Codex MRLs when they exist and look at potential deviations from the science-based MRLs in either direction (more or less stringent than Codex). For drugs without Codex standard, we look at deviation from median values. When Codex MRLs exist, variation and stringency above codex MRLs are minimal, a somewhat surprising and hopeful finding. Little protectionism prevails when a Codex standard exists. We find higher variation when Codex standards do not exist. We test for significant differences in MRL variation for cases with and without a Codex MRL and find robust evidence of higher variation for the latter. Increasing the institutional capacity of Codex for establishing a larger set of MRLs would reduce the heterogeneity of MRLs across countries.

Keywords: Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety; International Relations/Trade (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024-05-22
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/342915/files/O ... paper%202024%202.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:nbaesp:342915

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.342915

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Staff Papers from University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Agricultural Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:ags:nbaesp:342915