Rejoinder to Comments on “The Future of Rice in Asia: Public and Private Roles”

David Dawe and C. Peter Timmer

Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, 2025, vol. 22, issue 1

Abstract: Dawe and Timmer responded to the insightful critiques by Briones and Wong, who each highlight important but distinct perspectives: Briones urges deeper analysis of structural transformation, price stabilization, and climate challenges, while Wong emphasizes practical insights from private sector innovations and evolving trade realities. Acknowledging the value of both views, the authors focus their reply on specific points raised and express strong support for a proposed regional research initiative on the future of rice in Asia.

Keywords: Agricultural; and; Food; Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/358989/files/R ... JAD22.1_June2025.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:phajad:358989

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.358989

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development from Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().