Protection Data for China - A call for one definition

Nico van Leeuwen

No 330942, Conference papers from Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project

Abstract: Comparison of various sources of protection data for China reveals some striking differences. The differences between the nominal tariff rates and actual collection rates can’t be entirely contributed to the exemption rates. There is reason to believe that there are other forms of revenue leakage that are going unrecorded.

Keywords: Research Methods/Statistical Methods; International Relations/Trade (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 20
Date: 2001
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/330942/files/1649.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:pugtwp:330942

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Conference papers from Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().