Are the Economic Partnership Agreements a first-best optimum for the ACP countries?

Romain Perez

No 331463, Conference papers from Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project

Abstract: The 77 countries of the African Caribbean Pacific (ACP) group2 have been negotiating free-trade agreements with the European Union (EU) since 2002. The Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) will replace the non-reciprocal preferences the EU currently grants to the ACP group with a reciprocal preferential scheme that conforms to WTO rules. This paper estimates the effects of the EPAs on the ACP economies, and compares them with the potential impact induced by the alternatives to the EPAs. Based on an original methodology, mixing general equilibrium analysis and disaggregated tariff calculations, the paper highlights the significant costs induced by the EPAs, even under the hypothesis of a high asymmetry between the commitments of the ACP and European countries. It shows that switching from the Cotonou preferences to the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) and the Everything But Arms initiative would be less costly for most ACP countries than adopting the EPAs. Furthermore, it investigates the “GSP+” option, whereby the current GSP is extended to better cover sensitive products for ACP economies. It demonstrates that a marginally extended GSP would indeed be the optimum choice for ACP countries.

Keywords: International Relations/Trade; International Development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 27
Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/331463/files/2288.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331463

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Conference papers from Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().