Basing Superfund Cleanups on Future Land Uses: Promising Remedy or Dubious Nostrum?

Kris Wernstedt, Robert Hersh and Katherine N. Probst

No 10540, Discussion Papers from Resources for the Future

Abstract: Supporters of the effort to link cleanups at hazardous waste sites to the sites' expected land uses claim that amending language in the federal Superfund statute to allow this may yield a number of benefits. These include rationalizing the cleanup process and decreasing cleanup costs, promoting economic development in the local communities that host Superfund sites, and helping such communities exercise more control over the cleanups. However, interviews with Superfund stakeholders and a detailed case study call into question these arguments. The current role of land use in cleanup, uncertainties about whether economic development is likely at the bulk of Superfund sites, the long-run viability of institutional controls, the willingness of communities to accept cleanups that leave contamination on-site, and the nature of public involvement all suggest that the benefits of tying land use to remedy selection may not be so straight forward.

Keywords: Land; Economics/Use (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 23
Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/10540/files/dp980003.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:rffdps:10540

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.10540

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Papers from Resources for the Future Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().