Effects of Variations in Gin and Mill Cleaning on the Lint and Yarn Quality of Mechanically Picked and Stripped Cottons
Bargeron, J. D.,,
Warren E. Garner and
Roy V. Baker
No 313211, Marketing Research Reports from United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program
Abstract:
Several combinations of harvesting, ginning, and mill-cleaning practices were applied to cottons from the Midsouth, Southeast, and West Texas growth areas. The Midsouth and Southeast cottons were harvested before and after frost, and the West Texas cotton was harvested after frost only. Fiber-quality data on finisher-drawing sliver for the Midsouth and Southeast cottons indicated that removal of trash at the card, rather than in an earlier stage of processing, resulted in less fiber damage. No overall conclusions were possible concerning the effect of time of harvest on yarn quality. Some of the yarn-quality characteristics of the Midsouth cotton were better for the harvest before frost, and some were better for the harvest after frost. However, the yarn quality of the Southeast cotton was consistently better for the earlier cotton harvest. Spinning production rates reflected the level of yarn quality. There was little difference in the production rates of the before- and after-frost harvests for the Midsouth cotton, but the production rates for the earlier harvest of the Southeast cotton were higher than those for the later harvest. Generally, high production rates and yarn qualities were achieved with minimum cleaning at both the gin and mill.
Keywords: Crop Production/Industries; Marketing; Research and Development/Tech Change/Emerging Technologies; Research Methods/Statistical Methods (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 18
Date: 1978-08
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/313211/files/mrr1095.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:uamsmr:313211
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.313211
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Marketing Research Reports from United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().