The Domestic Wool Marketing System
Charles A. O'Dell
No 321947, Miscellaneous Publications from United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service
Abstract:
Report Summary: During the past 20 years, the domestic wool industry declined in almost every phase of production, marketing, and processing. The decline reflects, among other things, lack of information on improving the quality and preparation of wool clips--especially small ones--and on effective pricing. A survey in 1964-66 of producers, warehouse operators, local pool directors, and major wool processors showed that all segments of the industry had problems which had no easy solution. The survey information did not always provide objective guides to solving these problems, but alternative practices are suggested that would permit each segment to take advantage of new technology or combination of procedures in upgrading its operations. These practices are outlined in detail in the final section of the report; their use would help the wool industry to improve its marketing practices, reduce the total marketing bill, and deliver to processors the types of wool required.
Keywords: Demand and Price Analysis; Livestock Production/Industries; Marketing; Production Economics; Productivity Analysis; Research and Development/Tech Change/Emerging Technologies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 82
Date: 1969-03
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/321947/files/ERS-400.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:uersmp:321947
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.321947
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Miscellaneous Publications from United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().