Targeting Aid to Distressed Rural Areas: Indicators of Fiscal and Community Well-Being

Richard J. Reeder

No 278356, Staff Reports from United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service

Abstract: Improving the targeting of aid programs is a high priority among Federal and State policymakers. Commonly used indicators of fiscal and community well-being, such as unemployment, tax effort, and population size, disproportionately favor urban over rural areas. More care in the selection of targeting indicators would improve program efficiency and equity. Greater attention to program details, such as matching requirements, technical assistance, and the statistical properties of the targeting indicators, would also help tailor programs to rural conditions. Use of fiscal capacity indicators, such as per capita income, would keep program costs down by targeting aid to rural areas that cannot afford to help themselves.

Keywords: Community/Rural/Urban Development; Financial Economics; Public Economics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 63
Date: 1990-11
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/278356/files/ers-report-491.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:uerssr:278356

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.278356

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Staff Reports from United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().