Is pain management embedded in animal welfare? Evidence from a choice experiment with beef steak and milk consumers in the United States

Jasper Grashuis, Joe Parcell and Lijing Gao

No 369046, Working Papers from University of Missouri Columbia, Department of Agricultural Economics

Abstract: Consumers of products from food animals in general have a positive attitude toward the animal welfare attribute. However, animal welfare has various dimensions (e.g. cage-free, grass-fed, pain management), and there is little research to inform if the animal welfare attribute and its dimensions are complements or substitutes. We address the gap in the literature with a choice experiment to elicit preferences for the animal welfare attribute and the pain management attribute from 704 beef steak and 1,261 milk consumers in the United States. Using WTP-space mixed logit models, we find that (1) in isolation animal welfare and pain management each capture a positive and significant WTP, and (2) in combination animal welfare and pain management are complementary and raise total WTP. Additionally, we find certification of the pain management attribute by private or public institutions is of importance to the magnitude of the WTP.

Keywords: Agribusiness (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-09-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr, nep-dcm, nep-env and nep-exp
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/369046/files/AgEconSearch.docx

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:umcowp:369046

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.369046

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from University of Missouri Columbia, Department of Agricultural Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().