A critical analysis of the exceptions to judicial review

Paul-Iulian Nedelcu

Academic Journal of Law and Governance, 2016, vol. 4, issue 1, 52-59

Abstract: The review of the Romanian Constitution adopted in 1991, by the Law on review published in the Official Gazette No. 669 of September 22, 2003, represents a particularly important moment for opening and developing the Romanian administrative review based on the principles of a state governed by the rule of law. We say this because the new rules which it contains eliminated many faulty regulations that the Law no.29/1990 on the administrative review contained. Moreover, it brings new rules that fit much better the social and legal realities in our country, found in a moment of affirmation within the democratic world. The amendment that interests us in particular is contained in section 6 of Article 126, which provides the following: “the judicial review of public authorities’ administrative actions, in relation to administrative review, is guaranteed, except for those relating to the relationship with the Parliament as well as to the provisions of military command. The administrative courts are competent to deal with the applications of the persons prejudiced by ordinances or, as the case may be, by ordinances declared unconstitutional†.

Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://files.ajlg.eu/19000485/AJLGno.4.2016-uCOdIjuliN3MK_QtTmhX9g.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:agx:agxajl:v4i1p52

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Academic Journal of Law and Governance from Romanian Academic Society of Administrative Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dragoș TROANȚĂ ().