THE TRANSITION OF LAWS. ENFORCING THE ROMANIAN CONSTITUTION. CASE STUDY - DECISION no.66/26.02.2015 OF THE ROMANIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT

Bogdan Istov ()
Additional contact information
Bogdan Istov: Bar Association, bogdanistov@gmail.com, Iasi, Romania,

Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law, 2015, vol. 8, issue 8, 122-134

Abstract: This paper aims at presenting the birth of an important conflict of laws (Government Ordinance no.79/2003 and Government Emergency Ordinance no.66/2011), the subsequent wrongful actions taken by different authorities, the decision taken by the Romanian Constitutional Court on this matter together with its arguments (Decision no.66/26.02.2015) and, finally, a critical approach on the arguments of the Court.

Keywords: conflict of laws; Government Ordinance no.79/2003; Government Emergency Ordinance no.66/2011; Romanian Constitutional Court Decision no.66/26.02.2015; Romanian Constitution; law interpretation; retroactivity; transitional provisions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.jopafl.com/uploads/issue8/THE_TRANSITIO ... IAN_CONSTITUTION.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aic:jopafl:y:2015:v:8:p:122-134

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law from Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sireteanu Napoleon-Alexandru ().