On the optimal combination of naive and mean-variance portfolio strategies

Nathan Lassance, Rodolphe Vanderveken and Frédéric Vrins
Additional contact information
Nathan Lassance: Université catholique de Louvain, LIDAM/LFIN, Belgium
Rodolphe Vanderveken: Université catholique de Louvain, LIDAM/LFIN, Belgium

No 2022006, LIDAM Discussion Papers LFIN from Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain Finance (LFIN)

Abstract: A disheartening fact in portfolio choice is that the naive equally weighted portfoliooften outperforms the estimated optimal mean-variance portfolio out of sample. In an influential paper, Tu and Zhou (2011) reaffirm the value of portfolio theory by combining the two portfolios to optimize out-of-sample performance. They achieve this under a seemingly natural convexity constraint: the two combination coefficients must sum to one. We show that this constraint is unnecessary in theory and has several undesirable consequences relative to the unconstrained portfolio combination we derive. In particular, it leads to an overinvestment in the sample mean-variance portfolio, and a worse performance than the risk-free asset for sufficiently risk-averse investors. However, although wrong in theory, we demonstrate that the convexity constraint acts as a bound constraint on combination coefficients and thus can help improve performance when they are estimated. Our empirical analysis shows that the Tu and Zhou rule performs well for investors with small risk aversion, but quickly deteriorates as risk aversion increases. In contrast, our portfolio rules perform consistently well. Finally, we show theoretically and empirically that there are larger out-of-sample diversification gains from combining the sample mean-variance portfolio with the equally weighted portfolio instead of the minimum-variance portfolio.

Keywords: Portfolio optimization; parameter uncertainty; estimation risk; equally weighted portfolio; portfolio constraints (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G11 G12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 86
Date: 2022-07-13
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-rmg
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://dial.uclouvain.be/pr/boreal/en/object/bore ... tastream/PDF_01/view (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ajf:louvlf:2022006

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in LIDAM Discussion Papers LFIN from Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain Finance (LFIN) Voie du Roman Pays 34, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve (Belgium). Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Séverine De Visscher ().