EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Competitiveness in the Serbian growth strategy

Enes Ćorović () and Živorad Gligorijević
Additional contact information
Enes Ćorović: Department of Economic Sciences, State University of Novi Pazar, Vuka Karadžića BB, 36 300Novi Pazar, Serbia
Živorad Gligorijević: Faculty of Economics, University of Niš, Niš, Serbia

Acta Oeconomica, 2021, vol. 71, issue 2, 309-326

Abstract: The paper focuses on the effects of the reformed growth strategy on the competitiveness of the Serbian manufacturing industry during the period of 2007–2016. The paper applies the analytical tools devised by the International Trade Centre, as well as Balassa's RCA Index and some other methodologies. All indicators point to similar conclusion: the reformed growth model would significantly contribute to the improvement of Serbian competitiveness. The starting point of Serbia is also clear: small gross investment volume and a low average growth rate.

Keywords: growth models; manufacturing industry; Republic of Serbia; exports; EU market; market share; structural changes; competitiveness (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L16 L52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1556/032.2021.00015 (application/pdf)
subscription

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aka:aoecon:v:71:y:2021:i:2:p:309-326

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Akadémiai Kiadó Zrt., P. O. Box 245, H-1519 Budapest, Hungary
https://akjournals.com/

Access Statistics for this article

Acta Oeconomica is currently edited by Mihályi, Péter

More articles in Acta Oeconomica from Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kriston, Orsolya ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:aka:aoecon:v:71:y:2021:i:2:p:309-326