Concepts of the Fundamental and Applied and Their Application in Science

Natalya L. Korshunova (), Sergey I. Kotelnikov, Viktor P. Litvinov, Olga I. Matyash and Mark V. Ratz
Additional contact information
Natalya L. Korshunova: Far Eastern Federal University
Viktor P. Litvinov: Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «PSU»
Olga I. Matyash: Ivy Tech State College, Indianapolis, Indiana
Mark V. Ratz: Non-profit Scientific Foundation “Institute for Development named after A.I. G.P. Shchedrovitsky

Science Governance and Scientometrics Journal, 2013, vol. 8, issue 2, 67-81

Abstract: The article consists of two parts. The first part discusses the concepts of the Fundamental (F) and Applied (A) as constants used variously in specific cases in epistemology, science or education. The second part discusses how these concepts can be used in application to science. In contrast to a classic naturalistic perspective, which views F and A as essentialist and rigidly assigns these characteristics to specific areas of knowledge and science, the authors advocate the activity/action approach, where these concepts are viewed as a way of thinking, i.e. as functional, which is further demonstrated in the models «right-left» or «up-down» The authors argue that qualifying certain types of knowledge (tasks, research problems, scholarly or educational disciplines) as F or A is not determined by «the nature of things» rather it is defined by historical and situational contexts in which the concepts are used: issues viewed yesterday as fundamental today may be viewed as applied, and vice versa. Choosing between these two approaches has a direct effect on prioritizing certain policies and strategies (in politics, science or education). The authors state that the concepts F and A are used as a «switch» channeling thinking in the required direction. The collective article is followed by a short article by O. Matyash, who suggests a slightly different approach to the conceptualization of F and A. While sharing the notion of the F and A as functional intellectual tools, which application and interpretation may vary depending on situational contexts, she builds her argument from the viewpoint of sociocultural tradition, in which knowledge is viewed as constructed through social interactions and meaning-making, that is primarily through human communication.

Keywords: Fundamental; applied; functional; perspectives/ approaches; naturalistic approach; activity approach; social construction; politics; science; education; knowledge. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://en.sie-journal.ru/assets/uploads/issues/2013/14_05.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:akt:journl:v:8:y:2013:i:2:p:67-81

Access Statistics for this article

Science Governance and Scientometrics Journal is currently edited by Irina Ilina

More articles in Science Governance and Scientometrics Journal from Russian Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology (RIEPL)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lubov Pudovkina ().