The Nongraded Instructional System And Learners Academic Achievement

Marion A. Cresencio∗
Additional contact information
Marion A. Cresencio∗: Chief for Research and Accreditation Graduate School Secretary Polytechnic University of the Philippines Graduate School

International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 2018, vol. 4, issue 1, 33-46

Abstract: The Philippines is continuously seeking the best educational system that would provide the needs of the students, the industry, and to meet the international standards in education. Angelicum College is the only nongraded school in the Philippines that offers a unique system of education to its learners. The very purpose of the study was to find out the assessment of the learners on the nongraded instructional system and their level of achievement in Mathematics, Science, and English. The study used the descriptive-correlational method with the survey questionnaire as which has three (3) major indicators: the Teaching/Learning Approach, Role of Facilitators, and Evaluation System. Descriptive statistics such as mean and standard deviation and Pearson Product Moment or Correlation Analysis were also utilized. The learners assessed that the nongraded instructional system in terms of teaching/learning approach, role of facilitator and evaluation system. A 50-item achievement test in Mathematics, Science, and English was administered to the learners. The assessment of learners on the nongraded instructional system shows that they agree with a mean of 4.05 on the teaching/learning approach; 4.15 on the role of facilitators; and 4.02 on the evaluation system, with standard deviations that show homogeneous responses among learners. The learners agree on the importance of the nongraded instructional system which is categorized by teaching/learning approach, role of facilitator, and evaluation system. The level of achievement of learners show a mean of 30.86 in Mathematics; 29.32 in Science; and 34.11 in English, with standard deviations that show variations of scores by about 6 to 9 points. No significant relationship exists between the assessment of the nongraded instructional system and the learners achievement in Mathematics, Science, and English. It is recommended that the curriculum be retained because individualized instruction is efficient and that constant upgrading and evaluation be conducted to identify its strengths and limitations. The administrators may guide in realizing novel activities or programs that might lead to the vision that through the years, the unique system of instruction in the country would somehow influence for higher achievement of the learners in totality

Keywords: Nongraded instructional system; academic achievement; Philippines (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://kkgpublications.com/ijhss-v4-issue1-article-4/ (application/pdf)
https://kkgpublications.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/ijhss.4.10004-1.pdf (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:apa:ijhass:2018:p:33-46

DOI: 10.20469/ijhss.4.10004-1

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences is currently edited by Dr. Mohammad Hamad Al-khresheh

More articles in International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences from Dr. Mohammad Hamad Al-khresheh Calle Alarcon 66, Sant Adrian De Besos 08930, Barcelona Spain.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dr. Mohammad Hamad Al-khresheh ().