Reliability of a German Questionnaire about General Practitioners’ Handling of Female Urinary Incontinence

Elke Faust, Martina Juergensen, Susanne Elsner, Achim Niesel and Annika Waldmann
Additional contact information
Elke Faust: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinik Preetz, Am Krankenhaus 5, 24211 Preetz, Germany
Martina Juergensen: Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Luebeck, Germany
Susanne Elsner: Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Luebeck, Germany
Achim Niesel: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinik Preetz, Am Krankenhaus 5, 24211 Preetz, Germany
Annika Waldmann: Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Luebeck, Germany

International Journal of Healthcare and Medical Sciences, 2016, vol. 2, issue 9, 48-54

Abstract: Background: Recently our group performed a cross-sectional study in which 930 general practitioners (GP) in Germany and Denmark received a newly developed questionnaire concerning lower urinary tract symptoms. We developed the questionnaire on the basis of cognitive interviews with GPs and tested the reliability of the German version of the questionnaire in a test-retest process. Methods: 16 GPs took part in the test-retest process and completed the questionnaire twice with a time period of about four weeks between each attempt. The questionnaire consists of 28 questions. The given-answer categories and description fields sum up to a total of 60 items (answers). We assessed the reliability of answers by calculating and interpreting the absolute agreement and Cohen´s Kappa with a 95%-confidence interval for data that were nominal scaled and Pearson´s correlation coefficient for data that were interval scaled, respectively. Results: A total of 27 questions with 59 answer items were included in the analysis. Of them, 13 questions dealt with “management of UI†, six questions addressed the “communication about UI†, four questions asked for the “structure of the practice†, and five questions assessed personal data of the GP. Each more than 50% of the items in the subject areas “management of UI†(53.1%), “communication about UI†(66.6%), “structure of the practice†(57%), and “personal data†(100%) were rated as having high reliability. In summary, 35 of the analyzed items were rated a having a high reliability and 22 items were rated as having a moderate reliability. Conclusion: Given the low number of study participants our results have to be interpreted with caution, but is seems that the developed questionnaire is – for the vast majority of items – a reliable tool for assessing the communication about and the management of female urinary incontinence during a general practitioners’ consultation hour. Before application in future studies we recommend revising one item of the questionnaire in order to gain a higher reliability of this item.

Keywords: Questionnaire design; Reliability and validity; Methodology; Urinary incontinence. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/ijhms2(9)48-54.pdf (application/pdf)
http://www.arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=13&month=09-2016&issue=9&volume=2 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arp:ijohms:2016:p:48-54

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Healthcare and Medical Sciences is currently edited by Dr. Bonyah, Ebenezer

More articles in International Journal of Healthcare and Medical Sciences from Academic Research Publishing Group Rahim Yar Khan 64200, Punjab, Pakistan.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Managing Editor ().