Peacebuilding Model of Third-Party Mediation in the Philippines: Comparing Malaysia and the OIC

Shamsuddin Taya*, Rusdi Omar, Che Mohd Aziz Yaacob and Abdul Lantong
Additional contact information
Shamsuddin Taya*: Department of International Affairs, School of International Studies, Universiti Utara Malaysia 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia
Rusdi Omar: Department of International Affairs, School of International Studies, Universiti Utara Malaysia 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia
Che Mohd Aziz Yaacob: Department of International Affairs, School of International Studies, Universiti Utara Malaysia 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia
Abdul Lantong: Cotabato City State Polytechnic College, Sinsuat Avenue, 9600 Cotabato City, Philippines

The Journal of Social Sciences Research, 2018, 1151-1157 Special Issue: 6

Abstract: Many nation-states have increasingly found themselves in a situation where they are unable to sort out their domestic conflicts without third party mediation. This is particularly true for a country like the Government of the Philippines (GPH) who has been fighting violent protracted internal conflicts for many decades against Bangsamoro revolutionary groups. Therefore, with respect to the above, the purpose of this article is to compare peacebuilding models of third party mediation to the Bangsamoro conflicts with particular focus between Malaysia and the Organization of Islamic Conference, presently Cooperation (OIC). Its approach is primarily an eclectic, by concentrating on the strengths and weaknesses of the peacebuilding models of the third party mediation as employed by both Malaysia and OIC. The article is divided into two major parts. The first part discussed both Malaysia and OIC’s diplomatic approaches in dealing with the Bangsamoro conflict, while the second part explained inclusivity versus exclusivity of both Malaysia and the OIC respectively. The study found that Malaysia’s model is more durable and successful when compared to OIC’s. In fact, Malaysia’s quiet diplomacy and less confrontational approach with greater inclusivity were more effective compared to elitist and confrontational approach of the OIC’s mediation to the Bangsamoro conflicts. Indeed, the Government of the Philippines and Moro Islamic Liberation Front (GPH-MILF) peace process is one of the most inclusive peace processes in the world. It may have some who were left out in the peace process, but they were all consulted by both Manila and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) as opposed to OIC mediated Government of the Republic of the Philippines and the Moro National Liberation Front (GRP-MNLF) peace negotiations. Therefore, it is pertinent to conclude that there is nothing that resembles the inclusivity of the GPH-MILF peace process that characterized the exclusivity of the GRP-MNLF peace process.

Keywords: Exclusivity; GPH-MILF peace process; GRP-MNLF peace process; Inclusivity; Open diplomacy; Quiet diplomacy; Third-party mediation. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/spi6.3.1.1151.1157.pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/7/special_issue/12-2018/6/4 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:1151-1157

Access Statistics for this article

The Journal of Social Sciences Research is currently edited by Dr. Paola Magnano

More articles in The Journal of Social Sciences Research from Academic Research Publishing Group Rahim Yar Khan 64200, Punjab, Pakistan.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Managing Editor ().