 The unshackled workforce: three stages in the pandemic timeline in AustraliaBehnaz Avazpour, Christhina Candido, Iva Durakovic and Samin Marzban ERES from European Real Estate Society (ERES) Abstract: Since the onset of COVID, restrictions have forced many workers to change where and when they work (Marzban et al, 2021; Mendrika et al., 2021). In Australia, three distinct stages were experienced (ABS, 2021; Stobart & Duckett, 2022). In 2020, strict lockdown restrictions and the absence of vaccines meant that workers were mostly working from home (Duckett & Stobart, 2020; Durakovic et al., 2023). In 2021, a combination of snappy lockdowns and the increased vaccine uptake, meant that there was a slow push towards returning to in-office work (Massar et al., 2022). In 2022, lockdowns were lifted and the “living with COVID” stage meant a stronger emphasis on in-office work which has been received with little enthusiasm by most workers (Property Council of Australia, 2022). This reports findings from these three stages, focusing on the working experience reported by office workers in Australia. A total of 233 questionnaires from three rounds of the SHE (Sustainable and Healthy Environments) COVID survey were deployed in Australia, enabling descriptive and correlational analyses to be conducted. During the first of lockdowns in 2020, workers found the ability to perform more focused work and work-life balance were the most positive aspect of working from home. However, they were struggling with increased workload and setting up their home-offices with appropriate ergonomics. During all three stages of the survey, the most consistent positive aspect of not having to work from the office HQ was not having to commute to work and the most negative aspect was internet connectivity. Other reported positives and negatives changed through time though which serves as an indicator of how workers adapted their work and lifestyles. For instance, in 2021, survey results show that while workers were still reporting satisfaction with the improved balance between life and work, they also started to report their struggles with stress of increased workloads and isolation from colleagues. In 2022, during the “living with COVID” stage, isolation from their colleagues was the most notable pitfall of working from elsewhere. However, they found that having more control over their workplace and the ability to customize their workspace based on their needs as the most positive aspect of working from elsewhere. In all rounds of the survey, workers reported being more satisfied with flexible working arrangements post COVID-19 than with what they had access to before the pandemic and as such a clear desire for the gained increased flexibility to be kept in the longer term. Further, workers also indicated that interactions with their colleagues were the most important reason to work from office HQs. Since unshackled from office HQs in 2020, Australian workers may have gained greater appreciation of the value of in-office experiences and the need to interact with colleagues in person has increased over time but they are still unwilling to revert to pre-pandemic ways of working. In moving forward, findings highlight the need for companies to foster a supportive and adaptable work culture and style that suits the post-pandemic, unshackled Australian workforce. Keywords: Australian lockdown periods; Flexible working arrangements; Post-COVID workspace (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2023_81 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in ERES from European Real Estate Society (ERES) Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.