EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

From Kit Kat to copycat: Exploring Generation Z’s attitude towards copycat products in the confectionery category

Jamie Marsden, Ezgi Oguz, Briony Thomas and Freya Brown
Additional contact information
Jamie Marsden: University of Leeds, UK
Ezgi Oguz: University of Leeds, UK
Briony Thomas: University of Leeds, UK
Freya Brown: Future Brands Marketing Executive, PepsiCo, UK

Journal of Brand Strategy, 2024, vol. 13, issue 1, 72-83

Abstract: As consumers look to reduce discretionary spending, one option available to them is to switch to lower priced copycat brands. Facing such financial constraints, this paper asks whether Generation Z might prefer these more value-orientated products. Through four focus groups participants were asked to compare competing confectionery products from both copycats and leader brands. By drawing on their own experiences and responding to the physical products, participants were asked to explain their preferences when buying such products. Three themes emerged from the analysis. Firstly, contextual convenience shaped the available options when buying snacks; second, taste was assigned the highest priority for such relatively low-cost items. This preference was dependent on prior experience with the products and therefore brand familiarity and trust. Third, price disparity became an influential factor for the more generic tasting products but less important for products that were considered more distinctive in their taste profiles. The implication of this research is that for these types of low-cost, emotional buys, the price advantage has to be meaningful for it to translate into a cost-driven decision. For copycat products, this means that the greater the price disparity and the more comparable the taste, the more they appeal. For leader brands, this study highlights the importance of maintaining the emphasis on preserving their distinctive taste and keeping prices relatively comparable with those of competitors to avoid conceding market share.

Keywords: copycat packaging; look-alike brands; me-too brands; imitator brands; dupes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: M3 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hstalks.com/article/8592/download/ (application/pdf)
https://hstalks.com/article/8592/ (text/html)
Requires a paid subscription for full access.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aza:jbs000:y:2024:v:13:i:1:p:72-83

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Brand Strategy from Henry Stewart Publications
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Henry Stewart Talks ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:aza:jbs000:y:2024:v:13:i:1:p:72-83