Is the identification of matters in dispute pivotal to the legitimacy of party wall procedures?

Delwyn Jones

Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation, 2015, vol. 3, issue 4, 335-344

Abstract: This paper focuses specifically on two aspects of party wall practice — the significance of the clear identification of matters in dispute in relation to: the acceptance of appointment as a surveyor under the Party Wall etc. Act 1996 and the legitimacy of determinations made under the Act. It concludes with suggestions as to debate and possible reform of current surveying practice, to achieve closer alignment with the general legal concept of determination by ‘tribunal’.

Keywords: Party Wall etc. Act 1996; dispute; deemed dispute; tribunal; reform of surveying practice (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: R3 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hstalks.com/article/3301/download/ (application/pdf)
https://hstalks.com/article/3301/ (text/html)
Requires a paid subscription for full access.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aza:jbsav0:y:2015:v:3:i:4:p:335-344

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation from Henry Stewart Publications
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Henry Stewart Talks ().