Political economy and economics: criticism of the attitudes to and positions on what is common and what is different between them

Kamen Mirkovich

Economic Thought journal, 2003, issue 4, 3-35

Abstract: This article offers a detailed presentation of the criticism by J.M. Ossipov on the discipline of economics, which, as he considers, is breaking off from its subject, and in connection with this, he advocates the return of the economic science back to its classical and philosophical foundations. A constructive criticism is made on the Ossipov's thesis, by giving proof of the necessity of synthesis between economics and political economy, resulting into theoretical economy. In it, in addition to the theory of utmost utility, the theory of utmost value must be elaborated, and each of the two must take an equivalent place in the economic science.

JEL-codes: A12 A13 B52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ceeol.com/aspx/issuedetails.aspx?issuei ... 8d-aae2-0636e3527973
Free access

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bas:econth:y:2003:i:4:p:3-35

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economic Thought journal from Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Diana Dimitrova ().