Agitations for Self-Determination in Southeast, Nigeria: Causes, Impact and Response

Iheanyi Valentine Ekechukwu, Bonaventure Chigozie Uzoh and Nixon Chiedozie Udeji
Additional contact information
Iheanyi Valentine Ekechukwu: Department of Sociology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria
Bonaventure Chigozie Uzoh: Department of Sociology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria
Nixon Chiedozie Udeji: Department of Educational Foundation and Administration, Alvan Ikoku Federal College of Education, Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 2023, vol. 7, issue 11, 1251-1260

Abstract: People of the southeast, Nigeria had cordial relationship with the rest of the country prior to January 15, 1966 coup which was misconstrued as Igbo agenda together with General Aguiyi Ironsi’s (the then Head of State) failure to execute the coup plotters who lopsidedly killed Northern leaders. This resulted in the July 29, 1966 counter coup which led to radical turn of events for the Southeasterners following an eventual pogrom against them. Over two hundred people of southeast origin were killed in one night in Lagos. Women and children were also killed in the North. The high incidence of massacre made Southeasterners to seek self-determination as their lives and properties appeared unprotected by the Federal government, hence the Nigerian civil war. After the war, government formulated policies that impoverished Southeasterners, ranging from abandoned property to twenty pounds policy and indigenization decree. These policies fueled some feelings of exclusion and marginalization amongst them and have continued to form the basis of their suspicion coupled with herdsmen’s nefarious activities which have contributed to renewed agitations for self-determination. Using secondary data derived from scholarly publications, the study adopted social contract theory as the theoretical thrust of the paper to ascertain the causes of continuous agitations for self-determination in southeast, Nigeria. The remote and immediate causes of the agitations were descriptively discussed and analyzed. It was objectively deduced that people of the Southeast are marginalized and excluded in certain critical areas of governance. The study recommended all-inclusiveness among others as panaceas to halt further escalation of agitations.

Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ ... sue-11/1251-1260.pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ ... impact-and-response/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bcp:journl:v:7:y:2023:i:11:p:1251-1260

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science is currently edited by Dr. Nidhi Malhan

More articles in International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science from International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dr. Pawan Verma ().