Enhancing the Farm Input Support Program and Food Security: Challenges and Possibilities in the Case of Bungoma County, Kenya

Mr. Nobert W Wanyonyi, Prof. Beneah M Mutsots, Dr. Kathleen A Anangwe and Dr. James G Kariuki
Additional contact information
Mr. Nobert W Wanyonyi: Kibabii University, Department of Social Work and Criminology, P. O Box 1699-50200 Bungoma, Kenya
Prof. Beneah M Mutsots: University of Nairobi, Department of Sociology, Social Work and African Women Studies, P. O Box 30197-00100 Nairobi, Kenya
Dr. Kathleen A Anangwe: University of Nairobi, Department of Sociology, Social Work and African Women Studies, P. O Box 30197-00100 Nairobi, Kenya
Dr. James G Kariuki: University of Nairobi, Department of Sociology, Social Work and African Women Studies, P. O Box 30197-00100 Nairobi, Kenya

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 2024, vol. 8, issue 4, 2081-2095

Abstract: The focus on smallholder farmers as a drive to fighting hunger in the Sub-Saharan Africa is certainly becoming the focus of agricultural investments as governments race to meet the second sustainable development goal of eradicating hunger. The Farm Input Support Programs (FISPs) are emerging as the sure approach in doing this. This paper has emerged from a wider study that sought to examine challenges experienced in the Bungoma County FISP. This program is pro-poor and targets vulnerable households by supporting them with free fertilizers and certified maize seed for one season. The study adopted an ex-poste study design where qualitative and quantitative data were obtained from 450 beneficiaries, 8 key informant and six focus group members arranged in two groups. Purposive sampling, systematic random sampling and simple random sampling methods were employed in identifying study participants, hence both probability and non-probability sampling techniques were preferred. Beneficiaries were assisted to fill questionnaires in obtaining quantitative data, while interview schedules was preferred for Key Informants and Focus Group Discussions. Quantitative data was analyzed using a statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) and presented as both descriptive and inferential statistics, while qualitative data by content analysis and presented as narratives. The findings indicate that major challenges experienced in the program include political interference, governance challenges and poor attitude by stakeholders and beneficiaries. It is also observed that the program can leverage on the goodwill it enjoys among the farmers and policy makers. The study recommends for a more elaborate legal and policy framework, and also a beneficiary assessment tool that will stipulate the process and therefore guide the implementation of the program with an aim of streamlining the process.

Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ ... ssue-4/2081-2095.pdf (application/pdf)
https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/arti ... ungoma-county-kenya/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:4:p:2081-2095

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science is currently edited by Dr. Nidhi Malhan

More articles in International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science from International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dr. Pawan Verma ().