The Implications of Religious Conversion on the Determination of a Child’s Religion: A Comparative Analysis of Shariah and Malaysian Civil Law within the Framework of Maqasid al-Shariah

Maryam Jamilah Khairul Anuar, Arifah Aina Zazali, Nur Anisah Maisarah Abdul Wahab, Nur Ain Mahazir and Mohd Harifadilah Rosidi
Additional contact information
Maryam Jamilah Khairul Anuar: Faculty of Sharia Law, Islamic Science University of Malaysia, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
Arifah Aina Zazali: Faculty of Sharia Law, Islamic Science University of Malaysia, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
Nur Anisah Maisarah Abdul Wahab: Faculty of Sharia Law, Islamic Science University of Malaysia, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
Nur Ain Mahazir: Faculty of Sharia Law, Islamic Science University of Malaysia, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
Mohd Harifadilah Rosidi: Faculty of Sharia Law, Islamic Science University of Malaysia, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 2025, vol. 9, issue 7, 421-429

Abstract: The rise of unilateral religious conversions involving children in Malaysia has ignited significant legal and social controversies, especially concerning the jurisdictional tensions between Shariah and Civil courts. This study critically examines how the Federal Constitution, Islamic legal doctrines, and the ‘best interests of the child’ principle converge in determining a child’s religion following one parent’s conversion to Islam. Employing a doctrinal and comparative legal methodology, the paper analyses relevant state Islamic Family Law Enactments, pivotal court decisions, and statutory provisions such as Article 12(4) of the Federal Constitution. The study further explores the application of Maqasid al-Shariah and state fatwas in this context. Findings indicate that although Shariah courts traditionally assert the Muslim father’s wilayah (guardianship) over the child’s religious status, recent Federal Court rulings emphasise the necessity of consent from both parents for lawful conversion. The research highlights how ijtihad, grounded in maslahah (public interest) and dar’ al-mafsadah (prevention of harm), offers a critical pathway to harmonise Islamic jurisprudence with international child rights standards. Furthermore, administrative inconsistencies within the National Registration Department (JPN) are identified as potential threats to familial stability and child welfare. The study concludes by recommending legislative reforms and administrative guidelines consistent with the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and the objectives of Maqasid al-Shariah, aiming to safeguard the rights and well-being of children amidst complex religious and legal landscapes.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ ... -issue-7/421-429.pdf (application/pdf)
https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/arti ... -maqasid-al-shariah/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-7:p:421-429

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science is currently edited by Dr. Nidhi Malhan

More articles in International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science from International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dr. Pawan Verma ().