Nudger beware: Diagnosis precedes remedy

Pete Lunn

Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, 2019, vol. 3, issue S, 23-26

Abstract: Nudges are one type of remedy to policy problems. A good nudge preserves choice while using science to change choices in a predictable direction. The originators of the concept argue that this is the preferred approach when applying behavioural economics to policy. The present commentary disputes this stance. Although nudges can be beneficial, behavioural economics is uncovering problems in consumer finance, and perhaps elsewhere, where decisions have serious negative consequences and nudging is an insufficiently strong policy response. This is a specific instance of a general mistake, which is to prioritise one type of remedy before obtaining a proper diagnosis.

Keywords: nudging; behavioural public policy; consumer choice; regulation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B49 D90 Z18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://sabeconomics.org/journal/RePEc/beh/JBEPv1/articles/JBEP-3-S-6.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:beh:jbepv1:v:3:y:2019:i:s:p:23-26

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy is currently edited by Michelle Baddeley

More articles in Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy from Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics (SABE) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SABE ().