Auditing with Rewards for Honesty and Punishments for Cheating

Austin Henderson ()
Additional contact information
Austin Henderson: Washington State University, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Institute for Research and Education to Advance Community Health

Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, 2024, vol. 8, issue 2, 55-60

Abstract: Policies to deter misbehavior often use audits, which probabilistically detect misbehavior, and punishments. While punishments may be undesirable due to practical or ethical concerns, policies of auditing with rewards for detected good behavior are seldom used or studied. In an online experiment, I tested the effects of rewards for honest behavior, as well as combinations of punishments and rewards, on cheating. I found that small probabilities of large rewards were effective when combined with punishments, but small rewards were ineffective or backfired. These findings provide guidance for implementing rewards and contribute to knowledge of how auditing schemes affect behavior.

Keywords: auditing; deception; deterrence; risk; unethical behavior (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://sabeconomics.org/journal/RePEc/beh/JBEPv1/articles/JBEP-8-2-4.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:beh:jbepv1:v:8:y:2024:i:2:p:55-60

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy is currently edited by Michelle Baddeley

More articles in Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy from Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics (SABE) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SABE ().