Comparison of the Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighted (IPTW) Estimator With a Naïve Estimator in the Analysis of Longitudinal Data With Time-Dependent Confounding: A Simulation Study

Thaddeus Haight, Romain Neugebauer, Ira Tager and Mark van der Laan
Additional contact information
Thaddeus Haight: Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley
Romain Neugebauer: Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley
Ira Tager: Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley
Mark van der Laan: Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley

No 1139, U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series from Berkeley Electronic Press

Abstract: A simulation study was conducted to compare estimates from a naïve estimator, using standard conditional regression, and an IPTW (Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighted) estimator, to true causal parameters for a given MSM (Marginal Structural Model). The study was extracted from a larger epidemiological study (Longitudinal Study of Effects of Physical Activity and Body Composition on Functional Limitation in the Elderly, by Tager et. al [accepted, Epidemiology, September 2003]), which examined the causal effects of physical activity and body composition on functional limitation. The simulation emulated the larger study in terms of the exposure and outcome variables of interest-- physical activity (LTPA), body composition (LNFAT), and physical limitation (PF), but used one time-dependent confounder (HEALTH) to illustrate the effects of estimating causal effects in the presence of time-dependent confounding. In addition to being a time-dependent confounder (i.e. predictor of exposure and outcome over time), HEALTH was also affected by past treatment. Under these conditions, naïve estimates are known to give biased estimates of the causal effects of interest (Robins, 2000). The true causal parameters for LNFAT (-0.61) and LTPA (-0.70) were obtained by assessing the log-odds of functional limitation for a 1-unit increase in LNFAT and participation in vigorous exercise in an ideal experiment in which the counterfactual outcomes were known for every possible combination of LNFAT and LTPA for each subject. Under conditions of moderate confounding, the IPTW estimates for LNFAT and LTPA were -0.62 and -0.94, respectively, versus the naïve estimates of -0.78 and -0.80. For increased levels of confounding of the LNFAT and LTPA variables, the IPTW estimates were -0.60 and -1.28, respectively, and the naïve estimates were -0.85 and -0.87. The bias of the IPTW estimates, particularly under increased levels of confounding, was explored and linked to violation of particular assumptions regarding the IPTW estimation of causal parameters for the MSM.

Keywords: Causal inference; Marginal Structural Models (MSMs); Inverse Probability of Treatment causal inference; Marginal Structural Models (MSMs); Inverse Probability of Treatment causal inference; Marginal Structural Models (MSMs); Inverse Probability of Treatment causal inference; Marginal Structural Models (MSMs); Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighted Estimator (IPTW); longitudinal study; functional limitation; body composition; physical activity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004-07-11
Note: oai:bepress.com:ucbbiostat-1139
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1139&context=ucbbiostat (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bep:ucbbio:1139

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series from Berkeley Electronic Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().