Unit-Root Tests Are Useful for Selecting Forecasting Models

Francis Diebold and Lutz Kilian

Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 2000, vol. 18, issue 3, 265-73

Abstract: We study the usefulness of unit-root tests as diagnostic tools for selecting forecasting models. Difference-stationary and trend-stationary models of economic and financial time series often imply very different predictions, so deciding which model to use is tremendously important for applied forecasters. We consider three strategies: always difference the data, never difference, or use a unit-root pretest. We characterize the predictive loss of these strategies for the canonical AR(1) process with trend, focusing on the effects of sample size, forecast horizon, and degree of persistence. We show that pretesting routinely improves forecast accuracy relative to forecasts from models in differences, and we give conditions under which pretesting is likely to improve forecast accuracy relative to forecasts from models in levels.

Date: 2000
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (101)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: Unit Root Tests are Useful for Selecting Forecasting Models (1999)
Working Paper: Unit Root Tests Are Useful for Selecting Forecasting Models (1999)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bes:jnlbes:v:18:y:2000:i:3:p:265-73

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.amstat.org/publications/index.html

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Business & Economic Statistics is currently edited by Jonathan H. Wright and Keisuke Hirano

More articles in Journal of Business & Economic Statistics from American Statistical Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().