Markets for Public Services: Less Might Be More

Benito Arruñada

No 1473, Working Papers from Barcelona School of Economics

Abstract: This article suggests that the partial but strong incentives that characterized privately valuable public services in the classical 'liberal' state might be more effective than the comprehensive but weak incentives introduced by the 'internal markets' created when reforming the welfare state. The article compares three organizational forms: (1) the bureaucratic expense center used to provide privately valuable services such as healthcare through the organizations created by the welfare state; (2) the internal markets introduced to reform them; and (3) the hybrid solutions that have been used by the liberal state since the 19th century to provide such privately valuable services. This comparison suggests that market forces may play a better role in organizing public services when they are limited to a few variables, which makes stronger incentives possible and, at the same time, reduces the need for extensive planning and supervisory staff.

Keywords: competition; welfare; incentives; interbank markets; Bureaucracy; user fees; user choice; expense centers; public services (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H11 H42 H51 H52 K23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-law
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://bw.bse.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/1473.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bge:wpaper:1473

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Barcelona School of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bruno Guallar ().