What's in a u?

Antonio Penta and Larbi Alaoui

No 1494, Working Papers from Barcelona School of Economics

Abstract: We revisit the long-lasting debate about the meaning of the utility function used in Expected Utility (EU). Contrary to the common view that EU inherently links risk aversion to diminishing marginal utility, we demonstrate that these two concepts need not coincide. Marginal utility of money is an input into risk attitude, but it is not its sole determinant. An independent 'pure risk' attitude is also a contributing factor. We discuss some theoretical implications of this result for the following topics: non-neutral risk attitudes for profit maximizing firms; risk aversion over time lotteries in the presence of discounting, and convex time budget decisions; the equity premium puzzle. We also discuss matters of identification: for firms; via proxies ; via MLE methods under parametric restrictions; in intertemporal choice problems; and cross-context elicitation in multi-dimensional settings, and its relationship with the methods and results from Psychology.

Keywords: marginal utility; Risk Aversion; utility function (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 C91 C92 D80 D91 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mic, nep-rmg and nep-upt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://bw.bse.eu/wp-content/uploads/1494-1.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bge:wpaper:1494

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Barcelona School of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bruno Guallar ().