Evaluation 1 of "Population ethical intuitions"

Stijn Bruers

No 2025-37, The Unjournal Evaluations from The Unjournal

Abstract: Highly policy relevant, original research with clear hypothesis tests and valid statistical analyses.Biases and framing effects are mitigated but remain difficult to avoid in such surveys. Some results (e.g. the negative utilitarian judgments and a lack of asymmetry) seem to be contradictory. One possible explanation for an apparent contradictory result is not addressed.

Date: 2025-07-17
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in The Unjournal

Downloads: (external link)
https://unjournal.pubpub.org/pub/e1popintuitions (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bjn:evalua:e1popintuitions

DOI: 10.21428/d28e8e57.a3bb8738/ca41cb37

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in The Unjournal Evaluations from The Unjournal
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Davit Jintcharadze ().