Evaluation 1 of "Stagnation and Scientific Incentives"

Daniel Lee

No 2025-10, The Unjournal Evaluations from The Unjournal

Abstract: I think this paper raises an excellent point, but lacks sufficient support of its claims. I think the most important aspect of this paper is its overall ethos to do right by science, but struggles in terms of accuracy, novelty, and generalizability---all of which are discussed further in my report below.

Date: 2025-04-10
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in The Unjournal

Downloads: (external link)
https://unjournal.pubpub.org/pub/e1scientificincentives (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bjn:evalua:e1scientificincentives

DOI: 10.21428/d28e8e57.36ba6211/4e91c4a0

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in The Unjournal Evaluations from The Unjournal
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Davit Jintcharadze ().